As described in previous post
entitled “the internal quality audit” and conversely, there should also be an
external quality audits program in the medical device company. The internal
quality plan is to audit the state of things with the internal quality system
while the external audit is to audit the state of things with external business
entities associated with the device manufacturer. Examples are contract
research organization (CRO), contract manufacturing organization (CMO) and all
sort of suppliers of components and parts.
Depending on the complexity
of the medical device, sometimes, the sponsors has literally a few to a few
hundred suppliers. These suppliers need to be constantly audited to ensure
their quality system is in compliance to 21 CFR 820, ISO 13485, ISO 14971 etc.
Therefore, sponsor should
have a procedure that can provide a system and instructions and to assign
responsibility for conducting external audits of the quality management system
of suppliers and CMO.
Aside from the procedure,
sponsor should also has external audit plan, audit nonconformity report
template, quality audit checklist and a great external quality audit team.
For audit plan: QA is
responsible for planning and scheduling external audits of the quality system
of CMO manufacturing processes and raw materials suppliers. Because of the
enormity of the external audit program, therefore, it is prudent to choose the
audit frequency based on status and importance of the processes, products and
areas to be audited and as well as results from previous audits, previous nonconformities,
CAPA and customer complaints. Typically, each supplier should be audited once
in two years.
In the external audit plan,
the dates, assignment of audit teams, areas to be audited should be set clearly
and to be followed. External audit plans should be synchronized with management
reviews of the sponsor’s quality system.
For external audit team: External
quality team member should be qualified, experienced, have the necessary
education, independent and able to write well and fast. External auditors must
have expert level in ISO 13485, 21 CFR 820 and EU MDD, for example.
During the external
auditing, external auditors seek objective evidence to demonstrate whether the
audited activities conform to the requirements of the documented quality
system, and whether the system is effectively implemented and maintained. When
nonconformity is noted, it is brought to the attention of, and discussed with,
the responsible individual of the department.
At the end of the audit,
each noted nonconformity is documented using the audit Nonconformity Report.
External audit team should fill out only the first part of the form, describing
the nonconformity and handed over to the responsible individual who uses the
second part to propose correction, corrective action or perhaps a remediation
plan.
Upon
receiving the report, the responsible individual investigates the cause/s of
the problem noted as a nonconformity, proposes a correction or corrective
action to be taken, and indicates the date by which the corrective action will
be fully implemented. The external auditor reviews and approves the proposed
action.
Documentation and Record:
this is a critical part. External audits, implementation of resulting
corrective actions, and follow-up audits are documented. At the end of an auditing
cycle, all nonconformity reports established during the cycle are compiled and
analyzed, and are presented at the management review meeting
|
Reference
|
Criteria
|
|
ISO 13485 /8.2.2
|
Are the company’s audit programs planned?
|
|
ISO 13485 /8.2.2
|
Do the audit programs take into consideration the
status and importance of the processes and areas to be audited?
|
|
ISO 13485 /8.2.2
|
Do the audit programs take into consideration the
results of previous audits?
|
|
ISO 13485 /8.2.2
|
Are the audit criteria, scope, frequency, and
methods defined?
|
|
ISO 13485 /8.2.2
|
Does selection of auditors and conduct of audits
ensure the objectivity and impartiality of the audit process?
|
|
ISO 13485 /8.2.2
|
Does the audit process ensure that auditors do not
audit their own work?
|
|
ISO
13485 /8.2.2
|
Are the responsibilities and requirements for
planning and conducting audits, and for reporting audits and maintaining
records, defined in a documented procedure?
|
|
ISO
13485 /8.2.2
|
Does management responsible for the area being
audited ensure that actions are taken without undue delay to eliminate
detected nonconformities and their causes?
|
|
ISO
13485 /8.2.2
|
Do follow-up activities include the verification of
the actions taken and the reporting of verification results?
|
Disclaimer:
Although
the author had exhaustively researched all sources to ensure the accuracy and
completeness of the information contained in this blog, but no warranty and
fitness is implied. I assumed no responsibility and implied warranty of any
kind for errors, inaccuracies, omission, or any inconsistency herein. No
liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with
the use of the information contained herein. Readers should always use their
own judgment and review all related regulatory guidelines. Guidelines can
change over time.
No comments:
Post a Comment